IP Review Online
IP News by RSS
Client Services - Media Centre - Careers - Contact Us -

 

  • CPA Global
    Contact Us
    Media Centre
    Careers
    Events
    History
    Strategic Partners
    Our Offices
  • Articles by Subject
    Copyright
    Domains
    IP Strategy
    Legal Outsourcing
    Lighter Side
    Patents
    Software
    Trademarks
  • Articles by Industry
    Electronics
    Finance
    Food & Beverages
    Intellectual Property
    Internet
    Legal & Regulatory
    Legal Outsourcing
    Manufacturing
    Media & Entertainment
    Pharma & Biotech
  • Notes and Quotes
  • Interviews
  • IP Resources
    Industry Interviews
    Subscribe to IP Review
    About CPA Global
    White Papers
    Past Issues
    IP News by RSS
IP Review Online

Useful Links

Articles by Subject
Copyright
Domains
IP Strategy
Legal Outsourcing
Lighter Side
Patents
Software
Trademarks

Articles by Industry
Electronics
Finance
Food & Beverages
Intellectual Property
Internet
Legal & Regulatory
Legal Outsourcing
Manufacturing
Media & Entertainment
Pharma & Biotech

IP Resources

Industry Interviews

Subscribe to IP Review today

About CPA Global

White Papers

Past Issues

IP News by RSS

Latest IP Review Online Stories

Think Global, Start Local

24 October 2006 | Domains | Internet
RSS Feed Icon Bookmark Icon

Companies have traditionally rushed to register their domain names in the generic ‘.com’ hierarchy with less concern for local country-level domains. Now, with the shortage of new .com names, the trend is increasingly turning to country-specific registrations. Alex Wade introduces the implications for the trademark owner.

In the world of e-commerce, the domain name has become a critical business asset, a highly visible element of a company’s brand that extends worldwide. But whereas generic top-level domains (gTLDs), such as .com, have proved most popular in the past, many rights holders are now recognising the importance of ccTLDs (country code top-level domains) when it comes to ensuring global commercial presence and guarding their brand against infringement.

There are now 248 countries and territories around the world accepting domain name applications with their own ccTLDs, and further country and territory extensions are in their early stages, most notably the European Union’s .eu. In some cases, the choice of a ccTLD, such as .bz (Belize), .ie (Ireland), .mx (Mexico) and .ws (Samoa), may be prompted because a gTLD is already taken – either innocently or by a cybersquatter, but many companies opt to register both gTLDs and ccTLDs in order to improve their communication with foreign or national customers, and to ensure an easily recognisable brand at both a global and local level.

Ensuring a local presence
As David Engel, a specialist in media and Internet litigation with Addleshaw Goddard, explains, one of the most compelling reasons for the emergence of what could prove to be a trend in favour of ccTLDs is marketing: ‘A large multinational may have distinct national franchises, or a company may be associated predominantly with one country. In either case – in both national and international markets – it may be that it is sensible for the branding as a whole, including the domain name, to focus on the country of origin as well as to register the gTLD domain.’

If a company registers a ccTLD too late and the domain name is no longer available, it can run the risk of allowing others to profiteer from its brand

An example might be a company such as Ford seeking a number of ccTLDs in its target markets to avoid being perceived as a monolithic US conglomerate, or, conversely, a small-town business owner in Brittany, France, seeking to maximise their local presence with the .fr ccTLD.

Protecting against piracy
If a company has a market presence in certain countries, the registration of the relevant ccTLDs – whether for trademark, brand name or products and services – can also guard against problems further down the line. If a company registers a ccTLD too late and the domain name is no longer available, it can run the risk of allowing others to profiteer from its brand or be forced to embark on a costly battle to secure the domain name from alleged cybersquatters.

The Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) developed a procedure for dealing with cybersquatting problems in 1999, with the introduction of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). The UDRP is available for the gTLDs and an increasing number of ccTLDs, but certainly not all. Some ccTLDs have their own dispute resolution procedure, such as the .uk’s Nominet UK’s Dispute Resolution Service (DRS), but many others are yet to be established.

The formalities for registering a ccTLD are different depending on the territory, and registration may not necessarily be available for a business in every jurisdiction of the 248 ccTLDs now in existence. Some countries, such as France and Germany, require the company to have a local office subject to that country’s jurisdiction and IP laws, while others may reserve certain extensions to national government or residential bodies. Trademark counsel will be able to advise of any specific formalities required, and highlight the alternatives available.

As a general rule, however, the registration of a ccTLD is an important step in establishing a web presence in a chosen territory. Businesses would be wise to look into all the options when planning a domain name strategy to match their international e-commerce requirements.

For more information on the latest trends in domain name management, please e-mail domainnames@cpaglobal.com  

This article first appeared in
IP Review, issue 13

  • Top of article
  • -
  • IP Review Online home
  • -
  • Latest IP News by RSS
  • -
  • Social bookmark this article:
  • Bookmark Icon

Related Articles by Subject

IP Review Online, image representing choice of domain names
Clearing the way to fend off domain abuse
26th February 2010 | Domains | Internet
IP Review Online, image representing paperless domain management
WIPO wraps up first paperless domain dispute
8th February 2010 | Domains
© Copyright CPA Global Limited 2010

  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions