IP Review Online
IP News by RSS
Client Services - Media Centre - Careers - Contact Us -

 

  • CPA Global
    Contact Us
    Media Centre
    Careers
    Events
    History
    Strategic Partners
    Our Offices
  • Articles by Subject
    Copyright
    Domains
    IP Strategy
    Legal Outsourcing
    Lighter Side
    Patents
    Software
    Trademarks
  • Articles by Industry
    Electronics
    Finance
    Food & Beverages
    Intellectual Property
    Internet
    Legal & Regulatory
    Legal Outsourcing
    Manufacturing
    Media & Entertainment
    Pharma & Biotech
  • Notes and Quotes
  • Interviews
  • IP Resources
    Industry Interviews
    Subscribe to IP Review
    About CPA Global
    White Papers
    Past Issues
    IP News by RSS
IP Review Online

Useful Links

Articles by Subject
Copyright
Domains
IP Strategy
Legal Outsourcing
Lighter Side
Patents
Software
Trademarks

Articles by Industry
Electronics
Finance
Food & Beverages
Intellectual Property
Internet
Legal & Regulatory
Legal Outsourcing
Manufacturing
Media & Entertainment
Pharma & Biotech

IP Resources

Industry Interviews

Subscribe to IP Review today

About CPA Global

White Papers

Past Issues

IP News by RSS

Latest IP Review Online Stories

Law firm toasts Appeal double

25 January 2007 | Pharma & Biotech
RSS Feed Icon Bookmark Icon

The London IP office of global lawyers, Simmons & Simmons, released details this week of two recent victories at the UK Court of Appeal.

Acting for Conor Medsystems Inc, Simmons partner, Rowan Freeland, learned on 16 January that he and his assistant, Paul Inman, had successfully upheld a High Court ruling revoking an Angiotech patent for a drug-coated medical stent. Freeland and Inman had contended that the UK portion of Angiotech’s patent infringed upon a similar device by Conor. The stent is designed to be fitted within a patient’s vascular system, where it releases therapeutic drugs for the treatment of heart disease.

On 23 January, Will Cook, assisted by Sara de Sousa, validated Ferag AG’s patent for a print-finishing system designed to cut newspapers and magazines. The Appeal Court found that Ferag’s system – involving multiple knives working to keep pace with printing and binding machines – had been infringed by Muller Martini’s NewsTrim device. Lords Justices Mummery, Tuckey and Jacob ruled that Ferag’s innovation was neither obvious, nor anticipated by prior art, which had featured single-knife methods. Overturning a Patent Court ruling of 22 February last year, their verdict stated: ‘…the person skilled in the art would need a lot of hindsight to start from the prior art and make such variations as would bring it within [Ferag’s claims].’

Simmons & Simmons IP practice chief, Richard Binns, said: ‘Investment in research and development across all industry sectors can only mean that patent litigation and regulation will become more significant as competition increases.’

  • Top of article
  • -
  • IP Review Online home
  • -
  • Latest IP News by RSS
  • -
  • Social bookmark this article:
  • Bookmark Icon
© Copyright CPA Global Limited 2010

  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions