- CPA Global
Contact Us Media Centre Careers Events History Strategic Partners Our Offices - Articles by Subject
Copyright Domains IP Strategy Legal Outsourcing Lighter Side Patents Software Trademarks - Articles by Industry
Electronics Finance Food & Beverages Intellectual Property Internet Legal & Regulatory Legal Outsourcing Manufacturing Media & Entertainment Pharma & Biotech - Notes and Quotes
- Interviews
- IP Resources
Industry Interviews Subscribe to IP Review About CPA Global White Papers Past Issues IP News by RSS
Useful Links
Articles by Subject

ICANN to debate 'Whois' issues
22 March 2007
| Domains | Internet
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is poised to hold discussions next week on the future of ‘Whois’ records – data revealing the owners of domain names. Set to proceed at ICANN’s 28th International Public Meeting in Lisbon, Portugal, the talks will seek to determine whether flaws in the Whois system have left domain owners open to cybercrime and malware attacks, and what course of action – if any – should be adopted to enforce changes.
Delegates to the Public Meeting, which will run from Monday 26 to Friday 30 March, will be free to respond to points raised in ICANN’s Final Task Force Report on Whois Services, compiled by the Corporation’s Generic Names Supporting Organisation (GNSO).
Convened by the GNSO in June 2005, the Whois Task Force was charged with addressing concerns that ‘the amount of data that ICANN requires registrars to display in the Whois is facilitating all sorts of undesirable behaviours like renewal scams, data-mining, phishing, identity theft, and so on.’ It recommends that ICANN should aim to ‘rationalize the Whois data output and implement a new contact type called the “Operational Point of Contact” [OPoC]’
OPoC would ‘remove mailing address information from public Whois, and combine the outdated technical and administrative contacts in an updated role … Additionally, requests that would have formerly been sent to the registrant directly via postal mail or courier would instead be directed to the Operational Point of Contact.’
However, with registrant protection at the forefront of ICANN’s agenda, some industry experts worry that online infringers will be harder to target. International Data Group legal manager, Miriam Karlin, told the Sydney Morning Herald: ‘It would just make it that much more difficult and costly to find out who's behind a name.’
- Top of article
- -
- IP Review Online home
- -
- Latest IP News by RSS
- -
- Social bookmark this article:

Related Articles by Subject






