IP Review Online
IP News by RSS
Client Services - Media Centre - Careers - Contact Us -

 

  • CPA Global
    Contact Us
    Media Centre
    Careers
    Events
    History
    Strategic Partners
    Our Offices
  • Articles by Subject
    Copyright
    Domains
    IP Strategy
    Legal Outsourcing
    Lighter Side
    Patents
    Software
    Trademarks
  • Articles by Industry
    Electronics
    Finance
    Food & Beverages
    Intellectual Property
    Internet
    Legal & Regulatory
    Legal Outsourcing
    Manufacturing
    Media & Entertainment
    Pharma & Biotech
  • Notes and Quotes
  • Interviews
  • IP Resources
    Industry Interviews
    Subscribe to IP Review
    About CPA Global
    White Papers
    Past Issues
    IP News by RSS
IP Review Online

Useful Links

Articles by Subject
Copyright
Domains
IP Strategy
Legal Outsourcing
Lighter Side
Patents
Software
Trademarks

Articles by Industry
Electronics
Finance
Food & Beverages
Intellectual Property
Internet
Legal & Regulatory
Legal Outsourcing
Manufacturing
Media & Entertainment
Pharma & Biotech

IP Resources

Industry Interviews

Subscribe to IP Review today

About CPA Global

White Papers

Past Issues

IP News by RSS

Latest IP Review Online Stories

USPTO reveals plan to prevent plot-loss

19 June 2007 | Legal & Regulatory | Patents
RSS Feed Icon Bookmark Icon

On the weekend of 16 June, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released an extraordinary announcement in response to an applicant who has filed for a handful of so-called ‘movie-plot patents’. With four film plots submitted as ‘inventions’ by patent lawyer Andrew Knight now under the USPTO’s microscope, the subject matter has emerged as a necessary area of consideration. Aiming to define a clear path for processing such applications, the Office has outlined a series of points that applicants should address prior to filing:

  • Whether a search of the prior art was made, and if so, what was searched
  • A copy of any non-patent literature, published application, or patent (US or foreign), by any of the inventors, that relates to, or has a plot/storyline similar to, the claim invention
  • A copy of any non-patent literature, published application, or patent (US or foreign) that was used to draft the application
  • A copy of any non-patent literature, published application,  or patent (US or foreign) that was used in the invention process
  • Identification of any use of the claimed invention known to any of the inventors at the time the application was filed notwithstanding the date of the use
  • A copy of any publication of which the Applicant is aware concerning these applications
  • Identification of any court case that Applicant contends provides legal precedent for a grant of patent rights to the application
The USPTO adds: ‘Examiner realises that it may prove difficult to provide some of the non-patent literature that might have been used to develop the plots in question. For instance, it might not be practical to submit an entire novel or a motion picture in response hereto. In those cases, Applicant should identify the non-patent literature and provide a synopsis of the plot or other pertinent information. If possible, Applicant should provide copies of any particularly relevant passages.’

It is not yet known when the USPTO will make a decision on Mr Knight’s applications.

  • Top of article
  • -
  • IP Review Online home
  • -
  • Latest IP News by RSS
  • -
  • Social bookmark this article:
  • Bookmark Icon

Related Articles by Subject

IP Review Online, image representing pharmaceuticals
Patent priorities key to pharma strategies, says CEO
2nd March 2010 | Patents | Pharma & Biotech
IP Review Online, image representing vegetable soup
EPO to wade through vegetable patent soup
10th February 2010 | Food & Beverages | Patents
© Copyright CPA Global Limited 2010

  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions