- CPA Global
Contact Us Media Centre Careers Events History Strategic Partners Our Offices - Articles by Subject
Copyright Domains IP Strategy Legal Outsourcing Lighter Side Patents Software Trademarks - Articles by Industry
Electronics Finance Food & Beverages Intellectual Property Internet Legal & Regulatory Legal Outsourcing Manufacturing Media & Entertainment Pharma & Biotech - Notes and Quotes
- Interviews
- IP Resources
Industry Interviews Subscribe to IP Review About CPA Global White Papers Past Issues IP News by RSS
Useful Links
Articles by Subject

Medical tools org calls for surgery on Bill
21 June 2007
| Patents | Pharma & Biotech
On 19 June, the Medical Devices Manufacturers Association (MDMA) issued a press release and letter challenging key aspects of the US Patent Reform Bill, currently awaiting a House reading at full Committee level. The body, backed in its letter by 200 co-signatories, fears that some of its clauses could damage the US patent system and hinder the country’s economic performance.
In its letter, the MDMA says: ‘The value America places on intellectual property has driven huge investments in research and development and resulted in critical inventions in virtually every field of endeavour. As Congress moves forward with its efforts to modernise the patent system, it must do so in a way that values and advances all American innovators.’
The letter asks for four major changes to the Bill:
- Clauses stating that infringement damages should be linked to a patent’s improvement on prior art should be axed, as judges and juries will be forced to make calculations for which they are ill equipped.
- Provisions for an open-ended, post-grant review system should be deleted, as they could lead to the harassment of patent holders, who need more certainty in their lives rather than less.
- The USPTO should not be given substantive rulemaking authority, as the US Constitution already charges Congress with the protection of IP. Re-delegating that authority would weaken Congress.
- If sweeping changes are, however, inevitable, grace periods should be written into the Bill to provide patent holders with time to adjust to any law changes, particularly where filing is concerned.
- Top of article
- -
- IP Review Online home
- -
- Latest IP News by RSS
- -
- Social bookmark this article:

Related Articles by Subject






