IP Review Online
IP News by RSS
Client Services - Media Centre - Careers - Contact Us -

 

  • CPA Global
    Contact Us
    Media Centre
    Careers
    Events
    History
    Strategic Partners
    Our Offices
  • Articles by Subject
    Copyright
    Domains
    IP Strategy
    Legal Outsourcing
    Lighter Side
    Patents
    Software
    Trademarks
  • Articles by Industry
    Electronics
    Finance
    Food & Beverages
    Intellectual Property
    Internet
    Legal & Regulatory
    Legal Outsourcing
    Manufacturing
    Media & Entertainment
    Pharma & Biotech
  • Notes and Quotes
  • Interviews
  • IP Resources
    Industry Interviews
    Subscribe to IP Review
    About CPA Global
    White Papers
    Past Issues
    IP News by RSS
IP Review Online

Useful Links

Articles by Subject
Copyright
Domains
IP Strategy
Legal Outsourcing
Lighter Side
Patents
Software
Trademarks

Articles by Industry
Electronics
Finance
Food & Beverages
Intellectual Property
Internet
Legal & Regulatory
Legal Outsourcing
Manufacturing
Media & Entertainment
Pharma & Biotech

IP Resources

Industry Interviews

Subscribe to IP Review today

About CPA Global

White Papers

Past Issues

IP News by RSS

Latest IP Review Online Stories
IP Review Online, image representing chinese IP

China's vigorous approach to IP paying off

25 January 2010 | Intellectual Property | IP Strategy
RSS Feed Icon Bookmark Icon

Figures released by China's State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) show that the nation has achieved strong performance in its patent-filing rate over the past year, combined with a remarkable drop in trademark pendency. The improvements follow a 2008 state-driven push to intensify China's efforts in IP registration and enforcement. China's trading partners will welcome the figures as signs of progress from a country that has borne the brunt of criticism aimed at the IP regimes of developing economies.

Released this week, the statistics show that SIPO received almost 977,000 new patent applications last year, which was up by 17.9% on 2008. The lion's share of these applications (877,611) was filed domestically - almost 90% of the total, and up over 22% on the previous year. While the remaining overseas filings were down by just over 10% on 2008, the robust domestic showing indicates an emerging culture of IP awareness.

By class, the patent applications broke down into 229,096 inventions (up 17.7% year on year); 308,861 utility models (up 37.9%); 339,654 designs (up 13.7%). Final patent grants from SIPO climbed by over 41% to 581,992, with domestic grants coming in at just under 502,000. Foreign patent grants rose 14% on 2008, while domestic ones leapt by over 42%.

SIPO patent experts put the figures down to 'steady and relatively fast growth' in patent applications; a more efficient, or 'optimised', administrative structure for domestic filings and grants; and an increase in examination capacity, which gave SIPO the necessary man-hours to ensure that the volume of patent grants was 'palpably enhanced'.

However, improvements in the patents field were trumped by the performance of China's Trademark Office, based at the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC). According to SAIC figures, the office examined 1.3 million trademark applications in 2009 - up almost 110% on 2008 – and resolved 22,700 trademark disputes: a year-on-year rise of 128%. In the course of this, the Trademark Office cut pendency from 13 years to just three.

The roots of this success lie in a concerted effort by the Chinese government to step up the country's IP efficiency, beginning in June 2008 with the promulgation of the Outline of National Intellectual Property Strategy. Once that basic plan was tabled, it quickly led to an additional Outline to Vigorously Promote Implementation of the Trademark Strategy, which made brands a top priority. In October and November of that year, delegates from the Trademark Office and Trademark Review & Adjudication Board (TRAB) visited regional cities to research ways of improving the practicalities and awareness of registration.

That work was highlighted in a November 2008 address by President Hu Jintao to the Central Political Bureau, in which he spoke of China's need to 'stick to the road of independent innovation with Chinese characteristics', in order to meet the challenge of 'revitalising the country through science and education … and the strategy of intellectual property'.

Brigitta Best, director and head of trademarks at leading IP and legal services company CPA Global, told IP Review Online that her department had boosted its resources for watching Chinese trademarks. 'The Chinese authorities have recently published an exceptional, one-off edition of their statutory trademarks journal in an attempt to clear a larger portion of their backlog,' she said. 'This one-off edition has 30,000 pages as opposed to the normal 5,000, with a firm opposition deadline of 26 March. Because of this fixed date, there are likely to be less oppositions in the short-term - and, with SIPO having to deal with fewer oppositions, it should help make way for a faster, more streamlined registration process.'

Best added: 'China should be applauded for addressing this issue so vigorously. They are making great progress, although there is still more to do. The trademark profession is hopeful that, with China's strong focus in this area, registrations that currently take two years and oppositions that take three years will be reduced in the near future.'

By comparison, registration for a European Community Trade Mark [CTM] takes just three to five months. Interestingly, China's announcement of its IP figures also coincided with positive news on the CTM. According to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM), CTM applications in 2009 exceeded the previous year's 88,000 total by 200 - a strong recovery in light of a 12% fall in demand recorded for the first quarter.

In OHIM president Wubbo de Boer's view, 'Business goes on, and new products arrive on the market constantly. It seems that our customers continue to view community trademarks and designs as a cost-effective means of getting IP protection in the EU.'

  • Top of article
  • -
  • IP Review Online home
  • -
  • Latest IP News by RSS
  • -
  • Social bookmark this article:
  • Bookmark Icon

Related Articles by Subject

IP Review Online, image representing US high tech R&D
Congress plea to restore R&D tax credit
3rd March 2010 | Intellectual Property | IP Strategy
IP Review Online, image representing US justice
US raises stakes in IP crime fight
19th February 2010 | Intellectual Property | IP Strategy
© Copyright CPA Global Limited 2010

  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions